https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d49044c7530d28894e73763c21c417a423e4297c
commit d49044c7530d28894e73763c21c41
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a4b6fadd50968ec6c1b687fe52b88bd11ff734b3
commit a4b6fadd50968ec6c1b687fe52b88
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 8558
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8558&action=edit
quick fix patch
I was wrong about nested functions not using out-of-line saves. They can on
ppc64. Also, r11
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
This has been broken right from the initial implementation of plt branch stubs.
A quick fix is to use r11 in the stub when calling the save/restore functions,
safe because out-of-line save isn't used in nest
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18878
Doug Kwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Host|