[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2020-06-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cebd6b8ac1c5a2a847a50e3efe932ff2d0867b3e commit cebd6b8ac1c5a2a847a50e3efe932ff

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-13 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:22 AM, ppluzhnikov at google dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 > > --- Comment #15 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- >> FIXED > > What about Gold?

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-13 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #15 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- > FIXED What about Gold? Or any other linker that supports IFUNC and TEXTREL, but doesn't warn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8efa2874ab298f3923f4127340da119435f87c39 commit 8efa2874ab298f3923f4127340da119

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Sriraman Tallam from comment #10) > > Isnt this similar to execstack in some sense? I presume SELinux > disallows that too but that we do not completely ban that on > non-secure OS. Since ld.so

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8505|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread tmsriram at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam --- On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:08 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 > > --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- > Linker should refuse to generate binar

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Linker should refuse to generate binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-b

[Bug ld/18801] PIE binary with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol and TEXTREL segfaults on x86_64

2015-08-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18801 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libc|ld Version|2.21