https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #19 from Cristian Gavril Olar ---
Created attachment 9225
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9225&action=edit
Overlay BSS sections working
Thank you for this fix. I had a chance to try it out today and yes, th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=136a43b762ce7bc692645cc0d9d50c934f9aa392
commit 136a43b762ce7bc692645cc0d9d5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra ---
As I was reminded in private email, the patch does not in fact fix the
testcase. I'd still like to detect overlays automatically, even ones not using
the syntactic sugar of the OVERLAY keyword. So... Perh
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a87dd97a2098b7e18ff2574a4e81ae521ef7e6f2
commit a87dd97a2098b7e18ff2574a4e81
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #13 from Cristian Gavril Olar ---
Thank you for your patience and contributions to this thread so far. It was in
any case very instructive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #12 from Cristian Gavril Olar ---
Created attachment 9141
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9141&action=edit
Quick thing to check
I'd like to quickly check something with you all. See this attached modified
v
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #11 from Andrei Lupas ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
> Since there seems to be enough interest in this bug for people to actually
> write patches, here is what I think would work and be accepted:
>
> In lang_size_sec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #10 from Cristian Gavril Olar ---
(In reply to Cristian Gavril Olar from comment #9)
> I think these suggestions would be OK if the case would be that it is a
> general flag that is required to be detected, as per the very first pa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Cristian Gavril Olar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9136|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #8 from Cristian Gavril Olar
---
Created attachment 9136
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9136&action=edit
Additional possible suggestion with keyword in the linker script
Another suggestion with similar st
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Since there seems to be enough interest in this bug for people to actually
write patches, here is what I think would work and be accepted:
In lang_size_sections_1, near the comment "A backwards move of dot",
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Cristian Gavril Olar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #9132|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Cristian Gavril Olar changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Cristian Gavril Olar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Andrei Lupas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreilupas at yahoo dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Cristian Gavril Olar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cristiangavril_olar at yahoo
d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Matt Grochowalski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||MatthewS.Grochowalski at ge
dot c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
See https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-05/msg00330.html for why
lang_check_section_addresses can't check bss.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #2 from Matt Grochowalski ---
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;h=ec457111c02dd5a5e29ce7ce30e95a17ef470c78
The linker previously detected section conflicts involving the .bss section,
but this commit in 2009 chan
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
22 matches
Mail list logo
