https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #20 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_25-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c1b7d37c0d6bd15b1a154aef0c764a4350dd0f22
commit c1b7d37c0d6bd1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=10ab94ebf8fdabf14954f53f1d060fd470658512
commit 10ab94ebf8fdabf14954f53f1d06
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #18 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c9177d9a5c3e06d3344347c8068acfb7d8ecc8b
commit 1c9177d9a5c3e06d3344347c8068
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #17 from Jiong Wang ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #16)
> Fixed by git commit c4621b33
thanks very much for fixing this !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra ---
Fixed by git commit c4621b33
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3e2aa5bbd36be9cf63530e5db2f6cf3898762a22
commit 3e2aa5bbd36be9cf63530e5db2f6cf3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|jiwang at gc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
dimitry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #12 from dimitry ---
and yes; there is no .bss section when I use ld directly.. so is this gcc bug
then?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #11 from dimitry ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> Use "ld --gc-sections -shared" directly. You will see there is no
> .bss section at all. The .bss section you see comes from other
> input files added by GCC driver.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
--- Comment #9 from dimitry ---
hi, I was looking at the .so file. I guess the part I do not understand is that
.bss section is there; and PT_LOADS seems to be in place; so as far as I
understand there is no reason for making st_shndx for hz_i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17615
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|ld
Version|2.24
15 matches
Mail list logo