https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #9 from Corinna Vinschen ---
(In reply to Corinna Vinschen from comment #8)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
> > > I'm just wondering if the default-manifest shouldn't then be made
> > > into its own package, independen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #8 from Corinna Vinschen ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
Hi Nick,
> Hi Corinna,
>
> > After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
> > with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Corinna,
> After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
> with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
Excellent! :-)
> I'm just wondering if the default-manifest should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #6 from Corinna Vinschen ---
After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
I'm just wondering if the default-manifest shouldn't then be made
into its own p
Hi Guys,
Corinna wrote:
From my POV the linker is the right place to do this, and I think it would
be the right thing to add logic to ld to add the default manifest only for
executables and only if necessary, rather than adding it indiscriminately to
the linker scripts.
Hmm, I suppose that thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #5 from Corinna Vinschen ---
> GCC could handle the fact to add a default manifest only when building
> executables
If that's not clear: I'm referring to the fact that, right now, with the
default-manifest.o file being referred b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
Corinna Vinschen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at redhat dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
Cygwin/X maintainer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||corinna at vinschen dot de,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 7519
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7519&action=edit
Disable output if only -v or --verbose or --version is specified on the command
line
--
You are receiving t
10 matches
Mail list logo