http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 14:15:26 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2012-05-05 14:15:21
Modified files:
ld/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-05 04:51:23 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2012-05-05 04:51:16
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog linker.c
ld
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #14 from Jan Rękorajski 2012-05-04 16:55:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Created attachment 6389 [details]
> > A new patch
> >
> > This patch reverts the PR 13621 change and keeps the zero size
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-04 15:37:54
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 6389 [details]
> A new patch
>
> This patch reverts the PR 13621 change and keeps the zero size
> section if there is a symbol for it.
Pl
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #6388|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 13:47:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> HJ, you no doubt saw my attempt at trying to interpret the ELF spec to
> rationalize GNU ld generation of SHN_ABS symbols. Cary demolished my
> argument.
>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra 2012-05-03 13:01:21
UTC ---
HJ, you no doubt saw my attempt at trying to interpret the ELF spec to
rationalize GNU ld generation of SHN_ABS symbols. Cary demolished my argument.
So for one, my claim that there
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 12:35:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> HJ, your patch is cunning enough but really no better than reverting the
> pr13621 change, since your patch will likely result in elflint complaints
My patch a
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #8 from Jan Rękorajski 2012-05-03 10:25:44
UTC ---
Add lilo to the list of broken bootloaders...
HJ, your patch does the job, my kernel is deep into swap and running fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/use
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #7 from Allan McRae 2012-05-03
02:05:06 UTC ---
FYI, I have reports of the pr13621 patch causing kernel issues using both grub
and syslinux. Of course, both bootloaders could be broken...
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2012-05-03 02:03:10
UTC ---
HJ, your patch is cunning enough but really no better than reverting the
pr13621 change, since your patch will likely result in elflint complaints.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourc
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Versio
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.22|2.23 (HEAD)
--
Configure bugmail: http://so
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-03 00:33:11
UTC ---
Created attachment 6388
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6388
A patch
Please try this patch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #3 from Jan Rękorajski 2012-05-02 22:40:57
UTC ---
My bootloader is good old grub (0.97).
To tell the truth - I have no knowledge of its inner workings and no idea if it
relocates the kernel :(
--
Configure bugmail: http://source
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
Allan McRae changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||allan at archlinux dot org
--
Configure
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-02 22:12:29
UTC ---
Does your bootloader relocate the kernel? Absolute symbols
break the relocated kernel. Linker may need to keep the
output section if there is a symbol defined for it.
--
Configure bugm
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arekm at maven dot pl
--
Confi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14052
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
20 matches
Mail list logo
