subject:"\[Bug ld\/12494\] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization \(computed goto\)"

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2013-04-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2013-04-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-09 15:50:40 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2013-04-09 15:50:38 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf32-avr.c Log

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2013-03-12 Thread senthil.thecoder at gmail dot com

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2013-03-12 Thread senthil.thecoder at gmail dot com

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |senthil.thecoder at gmail

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2011-07-26 Thread bjoern.m.haase at web dot de

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 --- Comment #8 from Bjoern Haase 2011-07-26 15:26:13 UTC --- Maybe the two following hints are helpful: 1.) As a fast fix, there is a command line switch for the linker that disables the problematic rcall ret optimization. Execute your avr-ld

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2011-07-23 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.m.haase at web dot

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2011-07-19 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.20|2.21 --- Comment #7 from Georg-Joha

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2011-06-14 Thread anitha.boyapati at atmel dot com

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 --- Comment #6 from Anitha Boyapati 2011-06-15 05:19:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > It's definitely abinutils bug. Yes, ofcourse. > > Rewriting and tweaking C-source will not fix a binutils bug. The com

[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)

2011-06-14 Thread avr at gjlay dot de

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-14 19:50:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) It's definitely abinutils bug. Rewriting and tweaking C-source will not fix a binutils bug. The simplistic source just shows that avr-gcc actually can