[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13 17:07:56 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-01-13 17:07:52 Modified files: ld/testsuite : ChangeLog ld/testsuite/

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13 13:29:59 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-01-13 13:29:55 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld.texinfo ld.h l

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13 13:06:25 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-01-13 13:06:22 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ldexp.h ldexp.c l

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #7 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:15:39 UTC --- When dropping PR ld/12001 patch, what's with the testcase as reference to it [1]? - Sedat - [1] "Add a testcase for PR ld/12001." http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #6 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:10:18 UTC --- Wouldn't it be easier to just apply H.J. new patch on top of binutils trunk? I a 2nd thought I am thinking of cherry-picking PR ld/12237 (which is in binutils/experimental, see [1]),

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-10 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2011-01-11 05:56:00 UTC --- The testcase does in fact have multiple definitions of "defined", one in an object file, and one in the linker script. While it is true that we did not previously give an error for th

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #4 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-02 20:47:01 UTC --- Created attachment 5178 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5178 File defined4 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #3 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-02 20:46:38 UTC --- Created attachment 5177 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5177 File defined4.o -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 Sedat Dilek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sedat.dilek at gmail dot

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-01 18:06:58 UTC --- It is caused by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-12/msg00557.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail