[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-23 Thread jmihalicza at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmihalicza at gmail dot com 2010-01-23 21:41 --- Thanks for the investigations and the added error message. Indeed, the process was not infinite, it ended after a week: real10495m24.092s user10470m50.838s sys 2m38.622s -- http://sourceware.o

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-18 07:26 --- Fixed. You'll now get an error from the assembler. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPE

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 07:22 --- Subject: Bug 11168 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2010-01-18 07:21:46 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog coffcode.h Log message:

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-17 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-17 14:59 --- $ grep '\.section' main2.s | sort | uniq | wc -l 48940 So, we have a large number of sections. COFF uses a 16 bit field in the file symbol structure to store section numbers. BFD code in various places tests tha

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-15 Thread jmihalicza at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmihalicza at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 16:58 --- I have uploaded the asm and the object to: http://people.inf.elte.hu/pocok/main2.s.zip http://people.inf.elte.hu/pocok/main2.o.zip Both of them are <2MB. Also I updated my cygwin, from ld the following version

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 12:39 --- Hmm, OK my guess about memory seems wrong. Please compress and attach the .s file. If you can't do this because even the compressed file is too large, please try binutils-2.20. 2.18 is quite old, and whatever pr

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-15 Thread jmihalicza at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmihalicza at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 12:07 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Crazy C++ templated code take a crazy amount of time to compile/link on my Yes, I agree, this is a separated example, but such things can appear even in real applications when complex

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-15 02:52 --- Crazy C++ templated code take a crazy amount of time to compile/link on my memory starved machine. This is hardly a ld bug. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-14 17:55 --- ld finished in 2 seconds on Linux/Intel64 with trunk. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11168 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or

[Bug ld/11168] ld.exe CPU time >75 hours

2010-01-14 Thread jmihalicza at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From jmihalicza at gmail dot com 2010-01-14 15:48 --- Created an attachment (id=4513) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4513&action=view) Source producing the bug with N = 7 everything is fine -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg