[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2022-08-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|NEW

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2010-05-22 Thread andrew dot mahone at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From andrew dot mahone at gmail dot com 2010-05-22 07:08 --- Thanks, I'll try to get to rebuilding with this patch sometime this weekend. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on t

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2010-05-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|amodra at gmail dot com |unassigned at sources dot ||redhat dot com Status|AS

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2010-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 04:35 --- Please try out the fix against your sources. I don't have arm compilers readily available to test this out myself -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409 --- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2010-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 04:33 --- Created an attachment (id=4510) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4510&action=view) possible fix I reckon this could be the same problem as one I fixed for ppc64 in http://sourceware.org/ml/bi

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2010-01-12 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-01-13 03:09 --- I wonder why .ncdata has size zero in your map? I would have expected .ncdata 0x11e96ed80x8 load address 0x01e96ed8 0x11e96ee0. = ALIGN (0x10) *fill* 0x11e

[Bug ld/10409] Load address generated correctly, but applied incorrectly.

2009-07-17 Thread andrew dot mahone at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From andrew dot mahone at gmail dot com 2009-07-17 11:00 --- I should add that only certain offsets produce this problem - it appears that it triggers when the padding needed to reach the 16-byte alignment is 8 bytes. This has been added in this case (. += 8), but