https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28871
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
The semantics are different.
% ld.bfd -r --no-define-common a.o -o a.ro && readelf -Ws a.ro
ld.bfd: --no-define-common may not be used without -shared
% ld.bfd -shared --no-define-common a.o -o a.so && re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28871
--- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant ---
I do not see how gold's --no-define-common is incompatible with ld's. According
to the ld manual, and from looking at the original ld patch, they seem to do
exactly the same thing, which is in fact the oppo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28871
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-February/119689.html [PATCH]
gold: Remove GNU ld incompatible --[no-]define-common [BZ #28871]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
