https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=07b1c3dbd96ff68bcb9017d01feb6063b94d4bf1
commit 07b1c3dbd96ff68bcb9017d01fe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #6 from holger.berger at googlemail dot com ---
correct... the proper patch would not contain the 524 thing,
but some sort of patch is needed.
Am Fr., 19. Feb. 2021 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb bugdal at aerifal dot cx <
sourceware-bugzi..
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #5 from Rich Felker ---
Ah no, at least according to your patch the original gold bug seems to be there
still too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker ---
Oh, was this already fixed and the new comment just a matter of lustre
erroneously returning a value that's not a valid error code to userspace?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #3 from holger.berger at googlemail dot com ---
for me this patch works, but I think lustre should not leak it's internal error
code to teh client side, so the lustre part should probably not be part of an
official fix, and I think
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker ---
Why is this still open? It's trivial to fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
holger.berger at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||holger.berger at
