[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2018-12-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386|i386, powerpc64 Status|NEW

[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2018-12-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c0ab2ae3cc9af434ba926015d82a39cdf42c70bf commit c0ab2ae3cc9af434ba926015d82a3

[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2017-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- ICF in shared object is disabled for x86-64 on purpose. But on i386, both foo_hidden and foo_internal are folded into foo_prot. Because of if (length(act[0]) == 0 || length(act[1]) == 0) {

[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2017-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- [hjl@gnu-6 pr21128]$ cat x.c static int foo_static_0() { return 1; } static int foo_static_1() { return 1; } int main() { foo_static_0(); foo_static_1(); return 0; } [hjl@gnu-6 pr21128]$ make gcc -f

[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2017-05-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com,

[Bug gold/21128] i386: FAIL: icf_safe_so_test.sh

2017-02-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rahulchaudhry at chromium dot org -- You