https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
Dennis Schridde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devurandom at gmx dot net
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
Sora Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saih792 at outlook dot com
--- Comment #9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
Matt Whitlock changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sourceware at mattwhitlock dot
nam
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bero at lindev dot ch
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
X32 uses 32-bit pointers in 64-bit address space. It can reach
the full 64-bit address space:
[hjl@gnu-6 far-3]$ cat x.c
#include
extern int foo (long long);
int
main ()
{
long long addr = 0xff600
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > Technically, gold is correct to complain relocation overflow.
> > But vvar_vsyscall_gtod_data is in vvar page which is place
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> Technically, gold is correct to complain relocation overflow.
> But vvar_vsyscall_gtod_data is in vvar page which is placed before
> vdso page:
>
> 7fffe89d8000-7fff
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Gold can implement -z noreloc-overflow to disable relocation overflow check
and -z noreloc-overflow should be used to build vdso.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Technically, gold is correct to complain relocation overflow.
But vvar_vsyscall_gtod_data is in vvar page which is placed before
vdso page:
7fffe89d8000-7fffe89da000 r--p 00:00 0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 9644 [details]
> A patch
>
> Try this.
Works fine. Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 9644
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9644&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
