https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-09 05:36:17
UTC ---
This report was filed against gold, but the error messages are from GNU ld, not
gold. Which linker are you using? Should this be filed against ld rather than
gold?
--
Configu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
--- Comment #5 from Trevor Hemsley
2011-01-25 03:34:03 UTC ---
The rerun with binutils-hjl failed with the same 7 undefs as before. I checked
out the latest binutils trunk including the gold 1.11 version.cc and rebuilt
and this reverts to fail
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
--- Comment #4 from Trevor Hemsley
2011-01-25 02:30:55 UTC ---
No undefined symbols without -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
I've just transplanted this system onto a different one with 6GB RAM so I don't
have to wait 12 hours for the link to comple
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-25 02:20:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That branch also helps reduce the undefined refs even further. I did notice
> that memory usage peaked at 6.4GB this time round but the trunk+patch version
> ma
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
--- Comment #2 from Trevor Hemsley
2011-01-25 02:14:25 UTC ---
That branch also helps reduce the undefined refs even further. I did notice
that memory usage peaked at 6.4GB this time round but the trunk+patch version
may have got to that too b
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
