[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Samuel Bronson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||12977 -- Configure bugmail: http://s

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 devurandom at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||devurandom at gmx dot net -

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-07-09 05:33:26 UTC --- No response on libc mailing list. Filed a bug report: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12977 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?t

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-27 21:31:18 UTC --- I raised the issue on the libc-alpha mailing list: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-02/msg00154.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-27 18:12:22 UTC --- The key question here is what the glibc developers believe the correct behaviour should be. If glibc is currently acting as intended, then GNU ld should change (and fuse should

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #6 from Raymes Khoury 2011-01-19 00:13:04 UTC --- Hi Ian, Could we have an update on this? It would be nice to be able to push this patch. Thanks, Raymes -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Raymes Khoury changed: What|Removed |Added CC||raymes.khoury at gmail dot

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #4 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 06:46:57 UTC --- Whether there is or not a bug in the glibc loader, is not something that should matter here, IMHO. We have a documented use case that, ELF side, works exactly as intend

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-11-24 03:28:08 UTC --- Thanks for the patch. I've been troubled by this for a while, because defining a symbol in the base version doesn't reliably cause the glibc dynamic linker to select it when lin

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #2 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 01:23:18 UTC --- Created attachment 5138 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5138 Patch to solve the problem above -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzil