[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-02-22 Thread hydergine at seznam dot cz
--- Additional Comments From hydergine at seznam dot cz 2009-02-22 13:17 --- Ta, patch has been verified and it works just fine now. Petr. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-02-18 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-02-18 18:41 --- Petr, I believe this bug is now fixed in CVS. If you'd like to try updating your binutils and can confirm that the bug no longer arises, please set the bug to "verified", or reopen it if there's

[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-02-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-18 18:38 --- Subject: Bug 7059 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: da...@sourceware.org2009-02-18 18:38:07 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog coffcode.h Log message:

[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-02-17 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-02-17 16:52 --- Created an attachment (id=3748) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3748&action=view) Fix s_name field overflow. Also adds an error when the table gets too large. Now testing.

[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-02-17 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-02-17 15:52 --- Taking assignment. My patch doesn't address this one, but a trivial patch on top should do the job. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug gas/7059] Wrong COFF_LONG_SECTION_NAMES handling

2009-01-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-05 14:49 --- (In reply to comment #5) > A patch is posted at > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00043.html It is wrong: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00049.html -- What|Re