https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32487, 32486, 32484
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #20 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f087e2e3f6dece21c5cb6049b4531bf762a3068f
commit f087e2e3f6dece21c5cb6049b4531bf762a3068f
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra ---
Since I've put the PR number on fixes I've applied to Nick's patch, my fixes
all appear here. That makes it fairly easy to revert.
git revert 599739cc1c5d70ac958583130b4b5413aa101d8e
6d9b7667974372357fed1f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #18 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=599739cc1c5d70ac958583130b4b5413aa101d8e
commit 599739cc1c5d70ac958583130b4b5413aa101d8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> I'd like to revert the bug fix and add tests cases from PR32484, PR32486,
> PR32487.
Here is the patch to revert this bug fix:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #16 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6d9b7667974372357fed1f02c54a805f8c21dcde
commit 6d9b7667974372357fed1f02c54a805f8c21dcd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
vvinayag at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vvinayag at arm dot com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
The commit has also caused several regressions (likely the same root cause
though): PR32484, PR32486, PR32487.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c8fcfa9aad211dfd8296ae6e978a356797936c61
commit c8fcfa9aad211dfd8296ae6e978a356797936c6
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f404dc565a4ccfe6922b45cf5526c319aedf75d6
commit f404dc565a4ccfe6922b45cf5526c319aedf75d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9f2e3c21f6506f081f1360f02b847606e0e00995
commit 9f2e3c21f6506f081f1360f02b847606e0e009
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 15820
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15820&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Regis,
OK, please could you try out this patch and let me know what you think ?
Chee
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #6 from Regis Duchesne ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
Hi Nick,
> But in the meantime I think that I have uncovered *part* of the reason why
> the \@ counter is behaving strangely: The \@ counter is incremented at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #4 from Regis Duchesne ---
Hi Nick,
> I assume that you also feel the same about \+, correct ?
I feel the same about all arguments (explicit or implicit) which have the same
name in an outer and an inner macro. That includes any
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Regis Duchesne from comment #2)
Hi Régis
>> I think that this is more of a lack-of-documentation issue than a bug. >
> I respectfully disagree, I'll attempt below to argument in favor of my
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
--- Comment #2 from Regis Duchesne ---
Hi Nick, thanks for looking at this bug.
> I think that this is more of a lack-of-documentation issue than a bug.
> Specifically - I would expect \@ to evaluate to the same number anywhere
> inside a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
26 matches
Mail list logo
