https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #28 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5835278179d574b36fe916654f9197f2c6a02f3c
commit 5835278179d574b36fe916654f9197f2c6a02f3c
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #30 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5e3c96bded40e0f3a953288675742317cc35535e
commit 5e3c96bded40e0f3a953288675742317cc35535e
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #29 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a1299dc71ecd5cb89b85ab405c36b1ad76b8614c
commit a1299dc71ecd5cb89b85ab405c36b1ad76b8614c
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #27 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4184396d5878a49c3e25d28d76a278940f5fbe6b
commit 4184396d5878a49c3e25d28d76a278940f5fbe6b
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #26 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #25)
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/87a5hjmq7r@linux-m68k.org/
Thanks.
https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/73460160-a0bf-48d9-84b0-c531317d0...@suse
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Schwab ---
https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/87a5hjmq7r@linux-m68k.org/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #24 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> It also breaks GCC builds for ARM, AVR, PRU and others.
Do you have links to the potentially brittle assembly?
In the gcc repo, I checked a few `rg '\.macro' -g '*
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #23 fr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #22 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #20)
> I don't have a good solution, I see only hacks (e.g. above: fix _this_ very
> instance of '(1) (2)' being pasted, to not be anymore, or alternatively to
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #20)
> Or: accept the fact that '(1) (2)' is a single macro argument, even if
> surprising.
I submitted a test for it:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-Au
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #20 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #19)
> (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #14)
> > The scrubber removes whitespace between tokens of different classes, but
> > retains
> > whitespace between toke
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #19 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #14)
> The scrubber removes whitespace between tokens of different classes, but
> retains
> whitespace between token of same class, which sometimes makes it so that
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #18 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a86cec1a6f5127fc66737f95c2ba7938a755b63f
commit a86cec1a6f5127fc66737f95c2ba7938a755b63f
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #16 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=65d41fb015af0048347a25d0665bb1263eb982b0
commit 65d41fb015af0048347a25d0665bb1263eb982b0
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #17 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=87582defe75340e0003d4700568322379e9bc9f6
commit 87582defe75340e0003d4700568322379e9bc9f6
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #15 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #14)
> invoke 1 2
> invoke 1 + 2 3
>
> (support invoke is a two-arg macro,
fat fingering on my part doesn't help :-/ 'suppose invoke is a ...' was what I
meant
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #14 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10)
> > In which case it would also be impossible to fix anomalies there. In turn
> > meaning that hardly any bug i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #13 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #12)
> Where does the notion of using whitespace for argument separation in
> macro invocations (as opposed to definitions) come from?
I have no idea, and I neve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #12 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10)
> In which case it would also be impossible to fix anomalies there. In turn
> meaning that hardly any bug in parsing of input can actually be fixed. Not a
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10)
> (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #9)
> > I fear the only non-contentious answer to all such questions is: "act in the
> > same
> > way as currently" :-/ I.e.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #10 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #9)
> I fear the only non-contentious answer to all such questions is: "act in the
> same
> way as currently" :-/ I.e. try it out and emulate the behaviour.
In which
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #8)
>
> I've looked into what the options are of fixing this particular issue.
> Dealing with the one question of "should blanks be skipped here" quickly
> turns into
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #8 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5)
> Yet then documentation is unclear on whether there may be whitespace between
> the \ and the parameter name. We could of course make macro expansion skip
> whitesp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 fro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
It also breaks GCC builds for ARM, AVR, PRU and others.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> $ cat svml_d_acos2_core-sse2.S
> #define JUMPTARGET(name) *name##@GOTPCREL(%rip)
>
> .macro WRAPPER_IMPL_SSE2 callee
> call JUMPTARGET(\callee)
> .endm
> .tex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Testcase from glibc:
$ cat svml_d_acos2_core-sse2.S
#define JUMPTARGET(name) *name##@GOTPCREL(%rip)
.macro WRAPPER_IMPL_SSE2 callee
call JUMPTARGET(\callee)
.endm
.text
WRAPPER_IMPL_SSE2 acos
$ gcc -c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #2)
> While this use of macros may be in widespread use, that doesn't make it
> correct
> (and the gas/NEWS entry actually mentions a macro invocation of this same
> form)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.44 Regression] gas |[2.44 Regression] gas
|fa
33 matches
Mail list logo
