https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by Jan Beulich
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7fe76f02413fff61566ae52ec80d581da1e264a2
commit 7fe76f02413ff
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fb1c10585ead9acc8d9f9d24ab093cbe5e962257
commit fb1c10585ead9acc8d9f9d24ab09
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #8 from Jan Beulich ---
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-September/129587.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Antoni Boucher from comment #6)
> Do you mean that gcc produces invalid asm when using the Intel syntax and
> should be using pushq?
No. "push offset ..." is the correct form in Intel syntax. W
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #6 from Antoni Boucher ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5)
> Well, only partly: PUSHQ works, but PUSH (no suffix) doesn't according to my
> testing.
Do you mean that gcc produces invalid asm when using the Intel syntax a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Antoni Boucher from comment #4)
> I attached the ATT version (produced by gcc) that still works.
Well, only partly: PUSHQ works, but PUSH (no suffix) doesn't according to my
testing.
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #4 from Antoni Boucher ---
Created attachment 15119
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15119&action=edit
Working example with ATT syntax
Yes, this is useful for -mcmodel=kernel and the code continues to work w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com
Ever confi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
--- Comment #2 from Antoni Boucher ---
Created attachment 15113
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15113&action=edit
ASM reproducer for the bug
Here it is. You simply need to run GNU as on this file to trigger the error.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30856
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
11 matches
Mail list logo
