--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 08:16
---
Hi Mark,
> GCC build with "--with-cpu=ep9312" works fine with binutils. Your argument
> is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that?
Well since Richard Earnshaw is both the gcc ARM maintainer and th
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-09-07 20:02
---
This should answer my question :)
./as -march=ep9312 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=maverick
^^
sleepy - marc
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-09-07 20:00
---
Hi Nick!
GCC build with "--with-cpu=ep9312" works fine with binutils. Your argumentation
is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that?
IMHO there should be a common sense between gcc and binutils i
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-07 16:56
---
Hi Mark,
GAS does not accept "ep9312" as an architecture name. It only accepts it as a
cpu name. This is because strictly speaking the EP9312 is not a new arm
architecture, but rather a standard architecture w
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-08-15 09:19
---
To be more specific:
the binutils cross-build is successful. the gcc cross-build fails...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||r dot schwebel at
||pengutronix dot de
http://sourceware.org/bu
