https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4c0a6e603743ca0c85f9ceb9913d646f0c961986
commit 4c0a6e603743ca0c85f9ceb9913d646f0c96
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #9 from Haochen Jiang ---
Proposed patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-December/137954.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |haochen.jiang at intel
dot com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #7 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 15811 [details]
> There are more.
Thanks!
I would prefer the name as something like ME not Xe to avoid confusion for
lower case letters in mnemo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
I got
$ cat x.s
.text
vpsrlw $0x1f,(%r15,%rcx,4),%xmm0
vpsraw $0x1f,(%r15,%rcx,4),%xmm0
vpsllw $0x1f,(%r15,%rcx,4),%xmm0
vpsrad $0x1f,(%r15,%rcx,4),%xmm0
vpsraq $
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15809|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3)
> I will have a look into that.
>
> From my memory in assembler implementation, the {evex} prefix relies on and
> only on the register usage. It won't check mem
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #3 from Haochen Jiang ---
I will have a look into that.
>From my memory in assembler implementation, the {evex} prefix relies on and
only on the register usage. It won't check memory and will not consider whether
an instruction wi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 15809
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15809&action=edit
A patch
Something like this. Haochen, can you take it over? Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com,
11 matches
Mail list logo
