[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 Vsevolod Alekseyev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sevaa at sprynet dot com --- Com

[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=45bf072b34068b5a98947862b2aa183ab646e7ea commit 45bf072b34068b5a98947862b2aa1

[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > I agree that changing the test from >= 0 to > 0 will result in proper > readelf behaviour Hmm, no it won't. That might lose reg names from the header, or entries o

[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com