[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2023-05-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.39 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-04-22 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 Martin Liska changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #9 f

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e1dbfc17c5305eef8f021c1baa703151bffc1490 commit e1dbfc17c5305eef8f021c1baa703151

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13943|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- A patc

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread jan at jankratochvil dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil --- Yes, it works, thanks: real0m8.270s -> real0m0.048s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 13943 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13943&action=edit A patch Try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread jan at jankratochvil dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil --- No. But it spends all the time on: │3905 for (entry = list->first_abbrev; entry != NULL; entry = │3906if (entry->number == abbrev_number) I have no idea why it needs to read .debug_in

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Kratochvil from comment #2) > This "binarywithdwarf" has no separate debug info, all the debug info is in > it (this is why I did show it has 187MB). > All the time is spent in load_separate_deb

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread jan at jankratochvil dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan at jankratochvil dot net --- Com

[Bug binutils/28843] regression: readelf -n became slow without -wN

2022-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28843 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Without -wN, readelf may use debuginfod to download debug info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.