[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #10 from Achim --- (In reply to gee from comment #8) > Okay, Can I ask why this patch applied in binutils toolchain which targets > *-mingw32? That was a mistake that will be fixed in the next release. > Also, Cygwin/MINGW64(whic

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #9 from gee --- For someone who uses x86_64-w64-mingw32-binutils from cygwin, use below script to patch the affected ld executable file. better than recompiling every stuff to get your own. ### f=/usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld.ex

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 gee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jojelino at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from g

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Achim from comment #6) > So it turns out that removing the section at that commit (as I had done > during bisecting) would actually restore the previous behaviour (the > executable would not ru

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #6 from Achim --- So it turns out that removing the section at that commit (as I had done during bisecting) would actually restore the previuos behaviour (the executable would not run). Applying the same fix on top of both the 2.3

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #5 from Achim --- Created attachment 13976 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13976&action=edit Linker map new (ld-2.38 w/patches) Patch to discard the two DWARF5 sections identified during bisecting applied (

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #3 from Achim --- Created attachment 13942 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13942&action=edit Linker map old (ld-2.36) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #2 from Achim --- Created attachment 13941 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13941&action=edit Linker map new (ld-2.37) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 --- Comment #4 from Achim --- ...packages/binutils-gdb/build (2056)# objdump -r weak.o weak.o: file format pe-x86-64 RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0009 IMAGE_REL_AMD64_REL32 __main

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org -- You