https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
--- Comment #7 from Hannes Domani ---
Also, what does this mean for the gcc bug linked above, where this problem was
first submitted?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
--- Comment #6 from Hannes Domani ---
So this is the same as the patch I submitted here?:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115434.html
Maybe I should have mentioned it here, is this usually done?
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ba6eb62ff0ea9843a018cfd7cd06777bd66ae0a0
commit ba6eb62ff0ea9843a018cfd7cd0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
--- Comment #2 from Hannes Domani ---
Looks like adding only .debug_loclists is not enough.
For another example I also needed to add .debug_rnglists.
That makes me think that probably all DWARF 5 debug sections listed here are
necessary:
http
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268
Hannes Domani changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org
--- Comm
