[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=377170fa319d39d5442b674fc978adc8f24db5e9 commit 377170fa319d39d5442b674fc978adc

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d70f978b44aafc22d87c0e72d0875008c3d9e311 commit d70f978b44aafc22d87c0e72d0875008

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 Frank Ch. Eigler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fche at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > I am not building rpm. I am building 32-bit binutils master branch > on Fedora 32/x86-64. It was working before that commit, which fails > to check if libd

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > > > > It is quite normal to only have > > > elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.179-2.fc32.x86_64 > > > > Hmmm, but if you ar

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > > It is quite normal to only have > > elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.179-2.fc32.x86_64 > > Hmmm, but if you are building 32-bit rpms shouldn't you also have > el

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2) > It seems weird to have the header bug not the library. > Is that a normal occurrence? It is quite normal to only have elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.179-2.fc32.x86_64 e

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at sourceware dot org --- Comment

[Bug binutils/26301] [2.36 Regression] Incorrect detection of libdebuginfod

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26301 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Strange dependency on |[2.36 Regression] Incorrect