https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bc31405ebb2c4297ae815ab59f59165014347528
commit bc31405ebb2c4297ae815ab59f591650
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2020-01/msg00344.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> > > >0: 66 63 08
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #5 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> > >0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
> >
> > Looks correct to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
> >0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
>
> Looks correct to me.
movslq is AT&T syntax for 32 bits -> 64 bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0)
>0: 66 63 08movslq (%rax),%cx
Looks correct to me.
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Also
>
> 63 08 movslq (%rax),%ecx
This
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|movsx without REX_W prefix |movsxd without REX_W prefix
