https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Belyashov ---
Created attachment 12179
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12179&action=edit
Correct disassembly of incorrect opcode prefixes
This patch fixes incorrect disassembly of extra opcod
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=660e62b1d9ca02e4ec7b18e8f0a0ff0707e540ac
commit 660e62b1d9ca02e4ec7b18e8f0a0f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov ---
Looks good. I suggest to change printing of "nop ;%s" by ".db 0x%02x ; nop" in
case of double prefix. Or I may to do it later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
--- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov ---
You are right. 0x40, 0x49, 0x52 and 0x5b are ez80 opcode prefixes which changes
memory model of next instruction. 0x40 + 0x40 is impossible opcode.
I will fix it soon (within a week). You may try fix i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||z80-coff
CC|
