--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31
02:33 ---
Fixed:
2006-03-31 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR binutils/1860
* configure.in: Require makeinfo 4.4 or higher.
* configure: Regenerate.
Checking in configure.in;
/cvs/src
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|hppa-linux |
GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860
--
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31
02:18 ---
A patch is posted at:
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-03/msg00364.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-31 02:06 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> I think that raising the minimum requirement on Texinfo to version 4.4 is
> quite
> safe. I will submit a patch.
Thanks.
Dave
--
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-31
02:05 ---
I have examined the problem more extensively. The problem exists up to Texinfo
version 4.3 (and point releases of 4.3). Texinfo 4.4 adds the necessary support
for @include @value and is now the minimum
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet|hppa64-linuxinux|hppa64-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-12-23 03:30
---
Reopening; still not fixed.
Needs a makeinfo >= 4.2 < 4.5 (?) to repeat the behavior.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-22 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08
> ---
> It works for me.
This was caused by using an old
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08 ---
It works for me.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
GCC t
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-12 20:45 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> > Doesn't happen when not doing a cross.
>
> Don't know why *that* case is different, but for the
Different PATHs caused different ve
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2005-11-12 20:27
---
Subject: Re: New: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or
directory.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ../../../src/binutils/doc/binutils.texi:3495: @include [EMAIL PROTECTED]/../li
> biber
11 matches
Mail list logo
