[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2022-08-02 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-09 Thread cherepan at mccme dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Ok, figured it out -- tabs were garbled while copy-pasting from a Web-page. Sorry for the noise. The patch is working for me (binutils/strip-new and binutils/objcopy). -- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alexander, > Sorry, Nick, the new patch seems exactly as the previous. So it is. :-( I just assumed that I had made a mistake last time and so I regenerated the patch. I should have checked to see i

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-07 Thread cherepan at mccme dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Sorry, Nick, the new patch seems exactly as the previous. And it doesn't apply to git head. Did I miss something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #7909|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-06 Thread cherepan at mccme dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Cherepanov --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > Please try out this patch and see if it gets rid of those left over > temporary files... The patch doesn't apply to git head: patching file binutil

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 7909 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7909&action=edit Cleanup temporary files on error Hi Alexander, Please try out this patch and see if it gets rid of those

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alexander, OK - I have checked the patch in. With regard to your questions. 1) Leaving the temporary files behind is not an intended feature, it is a bug. I see about creating a patch to fix it.

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-05 Thread cherepan at mccme dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Yes, the check seems to be Ok in general. And the specific issues are fixed. Two remarks: - strip/objcopy don't remove temporary files and dirs when run on the test.a from below. Perhaps, this is i

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clif

[Bug binutils/17552] strip/objcopy: directory traversal

2014-11-05 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17552 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1