[Bug binutils/16893] libopcodes decodes some x86 prefixes incorrectly

2014-08-13 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/16893] libopcodes decodes some x86 prefixes incorrectly

2014-05-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug binutils/16893] libopcodes decodes some x86 prefixes incorrectly

2014-05-02 Thread rsc at swtch dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 --- Comment #3 from Russ Cox --- The patch fixes the bug, and the more aggressively used prefixes (fewer standalone prefix instructions) seem much nicer. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/16893] libopcodes decodes some x86 prefixes incorrectly

2014-05-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug binutils/16893] libopcodes decodes some x86 prefixes incorrectly

2014-05-01 Thread rsc at swtch dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16893 --- Comment #1 from Russ Cox --- Created attachment 7575 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7575&action=edit objdump 2.24 output [Here is the output promised in the initial report.] -- You are receiving this mail becaus