[Bug binutils/16891] libopcodes decodes x86 26 9B as 'fwait' not 'es'

2014-05-01 Thread rsc at swtch dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 --- Comment #4 from Russ Cox --- Thanks for the FWAIT fix. I'll file a separate report with more details, as you suggest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/16891] libopcodes decodes x86 26 9B as 'fwait' not 'es'

2014-05-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/16891] libopcodes decodes x86 26 9B as 'fwait' not 'es'

2014-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug binutils/16891] libopcodes decodes x86 26 9B as 'fwait' not 'es'

2014-04-30 Thread rsc at swtch dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16891 --- Comment #1 from Russ Cox --- Here are some related cases. They may be caused by something slightly different, since FWAIT is so special, but it didn't seem worth filing a new bug. The format is: : vs . I am claiming to know the because