--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-14
07:43 ---
Subject: Bug 10380
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-07-14 07:43:19
Modified files:
binutils : ChangeLog README
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-14 07:42
---
Hi,
I take your point about documenting the use of LDFLAGS="--static", so I am
going to apply the uploaded patch to the sources.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380
-
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-14 07:41
---
Created an attachment (id=4051)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4051&action=view)
Document use of LDFLAGS="--static"
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380
--- You
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-07-13
16:16 ---
Works with LDFLAGS="--static".
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-07-10 18:24
---
binutils uses libtool, and libtool uses -all-static instead.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10380
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug
--- Additional Comments From booleandomain at gmail dot com 2009-07-10
16:01 ---
It seems to work, thanks. But why do I need --static while all other packages
(gmp, mpfr, bash, ...) work with -static? Also, I think there should be a
document either in binutils sources or on the binutils
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-07-10 15:17
---
Subject: Re: New: cannot build binutils statically
Hi,
> I'm trying to build binutils-2.19.1 statically. I tried with
> ../binutils-2.19.1/configure LDFLAGS="-static" && make but I get:
Try adding a second dash
