Temporarily I solved the problem by compiling some
object files at -O1 or -Os. But this will explode again
later.
Now, maybe a linker script will be better than one more
dependancy for the users. I'm just wondering why does it
hit the ld limits. Where the limits low in that version
or does the cod
Hi Stelios,
Sorry. It's a suse 8.1 (quite old) with gcc 3.4-core compiled
from source, at x86. ld --version gives
2.12.90.0.15 20020717 (SuSE)
The code I'm trying to compile is made with a code generator
and it's indeed rather huge. It has thousands of functions
in one huge file,several sect
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Alan Modra wrote:
No, not until you give a lot more detail. You failed to even specify
the target you are using!
Sorry. It's a suse 8.1 (quite old) with gcc 3.4-core compiled
from source, at x86. ld --version gives
2.12.90.0.15 20020717 (SuSE)
The code I'm trying to
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:52:03AM +0300, Stelios Xanthakis wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> All of a sudden, I add one more function to my program
> and I get a weird "No room for program headers (allocated
> 6 need 7)".
>
> After some googling, it seems that this error has
> appeared many times before an
Hello.
All of a sudden, I add one more function to my program
and I get a weird "No room for program headers (allocated
6 need 7)".
After some googling, it seems that this error has
appeared many times before and the usual advice is to
modify the ld script. However, I have no special ld
script. Ju
