[Bug ld/30724] cygwin ld performance regression since 014a602b86

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 --- Comment #6 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5) > Created attachment 15045 [details] > reinstate seek optimisation Ist that the full patch? Because last_io is never set to bfd_io_read or bfd_io_write. -- You a

[Bug binutils/30725] severe objdump performance regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30725 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org -- You

[Bug ld/30724] massive ld performance regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org -- You

[Bug binutils/28719] DWARF-5 section names in PE/PEP and weak symbols in Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28719 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org -- You

[Bug ld/26757] Cross and Native GDB Fails to Build on Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- Comment #7 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Christian Biesinger from comment #6) > That bug report says it's about undefined weak symbols? Here, the symbol > should not be undefined at all, also not weak. (I think?) But both happen onl

[Bug ld/26757] Cross and Native GDB Fails to Build on Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 --- Comment #5 from Hannes Domani --- I'm pretty sure this is the same issue as PR26659. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 --- Comment #7 from Hannes Domani --- Also, what does this mean for the gcc bug linked above, where this problem was first submitted? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 --- Comment #6 from Hannes Domani --- So this is the same as the patch I submitted here?: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115434.html Maybe I should have mentioned it here, is this usually done? -- You are receiving

[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ld/26659] x86_64 pe relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26659 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org -- You

[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 --- Comment #2 from Hannes Domani --- Looks like adding only .debug_loclists is not enough. For another example I also needed to add .debug_rnglists. That makes me think that probably all DWARF 5 debug sections listed here are necessary: http

[Bug binutils/27268] mingw-w64 fails with dwarf5

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27268 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org

[Bug ld/26757] Cross and Native GDB Fails to Build on Cygwin

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 Hannes Domani changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ssbssa at sourceware dot org

[Bug ld/20097] [src/ld/testplug4.c:611]: (warning) Calling 'sizeof' on 'sizeof'.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20097 --- Comment #3 from Hannes Domani --- *** Bug 18015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.