[Bug gold/21491] --fix-cortex-a53-843419 Errata workaround can produce broken images

2017-07-11 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21491 --- Comment #3 from Han Shen --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2) > Fixed on trunk. Does this need to be backported? Yes, considering the severity of the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug gold/21215] New: Gold linker segfaults linking symbols with different versions.

2017-03-03 Thread shenhan at google dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: shenhan at google dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Gold linker segfaults linking symbols with different versions. The scenarios is

[Bug gold/20765] [2.27 Regression] gold internal error in fix_errata on aarch64-linux-gnu

2016-12-04 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20765 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenhan at google dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gold/20529] New: Gold [powerpc] - relaxing loop never ends

2016-08-26 Thread shenhan at google dot com
Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: shenhan at google dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Here is one particular case that causes gold PPC linker trapped in a endless relaxing loop. (I do not provide a reproducible case

[Bug gold/19891] arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect

2016-04-18 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19891 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19891] arm: The order of IFUNC (R_ARM_IRELATIVE and R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT) relocations is incorrect

2016-04-06 Thread shenhan at google dot com
||shenhan at google dot com --- Comment #1 from Han Shen --- Hi Dimitry, would you mind provide the commands / sources to reproduce this bug? I'll take a look at it. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug gold/19472] [aarch64] Large shared objects need pc-relative stubs or relocations for absolute stubs

2016-02-05 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19472 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19042] unsupported reloc 311/312

2016-01-15 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19042 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/19472] [aarch64] Large shared objects need pc-relative stubs or relocations for absolute stubs

2016-01-14 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19472 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenhan at google dot com

[Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418

2016-01-07 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenhan at google dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug gold/19163] arm64: zero out *reloc for bug compatibility with android linker

2015-10-22 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19163 --- Comment #3 from Han Shen --- Hi Cary, "*reloc" in this context refers to the dynamic relocation spot which shall be filled by android linker during binary loadup. Gold pre-fills "symbol value" to this spot, while bfd zeros it out. Actual

[Bug gold/18348] Workaround ARM Cortex-A53 Errata 835769 & 843419

2015-05-08 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18348 --- Comment #1 from Han Shen --- Work in progress. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-08 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18365 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-05 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18365 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shenhan at google dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-05 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18365 --- Comment #5 from Han Shen --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > Hi Han, > > Thank you for taking a look at this problem. > > > I was not able to run your script - the 'libc.so' in the archive is > > not a binary but a linker

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-01 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18365 --- Comment #3 from Han Shen --- Hi Nick, I was not able to run your script - the 'libc.so' in the archive is not a binary but a linker script pointing to files under your home - "/home/nickc/work/builds/binutils/branches/2.25/aarch64-elf-gold

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-01 Thread shenhan at google dot com
outant changed: > >What|Removed |Added > > > Status|NEW |ASSIGNED >Assignee|ccoutant at gmail dot com

[Bug gold/18048] None-top-level INCLUDE not properly supported

2015-03-21 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18048 --- Comment #4 from Han Shen --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailma

[Bug gold/18048] None-top-level INCLUDE not properly supported

2015-02-27 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18048 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ccoutant at google dot com |shenhan at google dot com -- You

[Bug gold/18048] None-top-level INCLUDE not properly supported

2015-02-27 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18048 --- Comment #1 from Han Shen --- By investigating, in script.cc, "script_include_directive" function always assumes "INCLUDE" is top-most level. I'm working on a patch to expand each "INCLUDE" to reconstruct the script text and re-do the pars

[Bug gold/18048] New: None-top-level INCLUDE not properly supported

2015-02-27 Thread shenhan at google dot com
Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at google dot com Reporter: shenhan at google dot com CC: ian at airs dot com We observed this problem building chromeos , I have a simplified case below - file: test.ld SECTIONS { INCLUDE "test-inc.ld" } file: test-i

[Bug binutils/17415] New: Overflow in relocation (R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12) silently ignored

2014-09-19 Thread shenhan at google dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: shenhan at google dot com Created attachment 7795 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7795&action=edit test case Hi while developing g