[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #7 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:15:39 UTC --- When dropping PR ld/12001 patch, what's with the testcase as reference to it [1]? - Sedat - [1] "Add a testcase for PR ld/12001." http://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils.git;a=commit;

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-11 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #6 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-11 12:10:18 UTC --- Wouldn't it be easier to just apply H.J. new patch on top of binutils trunk? I a 2nd thought I am thinking of cherry-picking PR ld/12237 (which is in binutils/experimental, see [1]),

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #4 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-02 20:47:01 UTC --- Created attachment 5178 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5178 File defined4 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 --- Comment #3 from Sedat Dilek 2011-01-02 20:46:38 UTC --- Created attachment 5177 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5177 File defined4.o -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug ld/12356] [Regression] x86_64 kernel failed to link

2011-01-02 Thread sedat.dilek at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12356 Sedat Dilek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sedat.dilek at gmail dot