https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 15894
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15894&action=edit
proposed patch (hack?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.44
--
You are receiving this mail be
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nickc at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: *-*-solaris2.11
When trying the binutils 2.44 branch on Solaris, I found
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.44
--
You are receiving this mail be
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: jbeulich at suse dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11, amd64-pc-solaris2.11
I just tried gcc trunk bootstraps
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.41
Resolution|---
Version: 2.40
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libctf
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: nick.alcock at oracle dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://sourceware.org/pipe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #28)
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #27)
> > Created attachment 14577 [details]
> > Augmented patch, incorporating review comments
>
> expected_tls_le should be u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #29 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 14590
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14590&action=edit
Augmented^2 patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14568|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #25 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 14568
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14568&action=edit
Augmented patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth -
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: i?86-pc-solaris2.11
Target: i?86-pc-solaris2.11
||https://sourceware.org/pipe
||rmail/binutils/2022-July/12
||2057.html
Target Milestone|--- |2.39
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ro at gcc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29424
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 14237
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14237&action=edit
Debian 11/sparc64 testcse
I see the binutils bugzilla filesize limit is way larger than GCC's, so
attaching
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
When building LLVM main on Debian 11/sparc64, I ran into a
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, sparc64-sun-linux-gnu
Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11, sparc64-sun-linux-gnu
Build: sparcv9-sun
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: *-*-solaris2.11
When building binutils trunk with gcc 12.1.0, several CTF tests FAIL:
FAIL: Arrays (conflicted)
FAIL: Conflicting cycle 1.B-1
FAIL: Conflicting
Component: libctf
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: amd64--c-solaris2.11, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
When investigating a different CTF issue on Solaris, I built binutils trunk
with
gcc 12.1.0 -g3 -O0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27666
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.37
--
You are receiving this mail be
y: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.*
On binutils master, quite a number of tests currently fail on Solaris/sp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 12618
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12618&action=edit
ld-elf/eh5 readelf -wf output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25802
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 12617
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12617&action=edit
ld-elf/eh5 elfdump -u output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: davem at davemloft dot net, jose.marchesi at oracle dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Several of the ld TLS tests FAIL on Solaris/SPARC
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
When running make check on 32-bit Solaris
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 10807
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10807&action=edit
assembler output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
||2018-02-09
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |2.31
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
I'm seeing the same (a regression, if you can call it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
V
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: *-*-solaris2.*
A couple of ld testcases FAIL on Solaris because that platform doesn't support
all-static bin
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: 2.30
Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
Target: sparc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22721
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.30
--
You are receiving this mail be
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Host: i386-pc-solaris2.11
Target: i386-pc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Using = to refer to the sysroot prefix in both the -L option and the INPUT
command is not very expressive/mnemonic. It would seem useful to additionall
support $SYSROOT similarly to
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Playing around with gcc --sysroot, I noticed a weird ld behaviour. I've
observed
this with native gcc mainline and gld 2.28, on both i3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20989
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 9722
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9722&action=edit
input objects and executables
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc-sun-solaris2.12
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.12
Build: sparc-sun-solaris2.12
For some time, Solaris
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Target: sparc*-sun-solaris2.*
Build: sparc*-sun
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Solaris elfdump complains about sh_entsize being 0for .init_array etc.
sections. The following example is on Solaris/x86, but the same applies to
42 matches
Mail list logo