TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: alpha-dec-osf5.1b
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11518
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is
Alpha ECOFF
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld d
: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-21 14:44 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
I've now filed a bug against Sun as:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=67
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-19 17:08 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> OK - I have checked in the patch along with this changelog entry.
gr
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-18 18:23 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> So, are you saying that assembling with gas v2.19 fixes the problem ?
ind
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-18 14:41 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> Oh, well the "progbits" attribute indicates that the section con
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-18 14:10 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> I think that this is a separate problem, rather than fallout from the
certai
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-18 13:05 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> OK, I have uploaded a third patch for you to try. This one works(1) for
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 18:13 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> Ok, this is going nowhere. Is it possible for you to create a small
> te
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 18:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=3069)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3069&action=view)
object file that shows both the original and new problems
--
What|
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=3068)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3068&action=view)
problematic object file
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 17:48 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> (Only the last line has changed).
done, but not much better either: at firs
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 17:29 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> OK taking Ian's comments into account I have uploaded another atte
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-14 15:09 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> As a matter of interest if you change this to:
>
>if ((! ABI_6
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7027
--- You are receiving this mail b
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-14 14:15 ---
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> I am not familiar with the Sparc architecture, but I have uploade
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-13 19:54 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > the last half-sentence about memory corruption: no detai
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-13 19:19 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > Unfortunately, the relevant section
> >
> >
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-13 19:02 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Not really, there are more annoying problems and tha
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-13 14:51 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au writes:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2008-11/msg00052.html
>
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-12 18:16 ---
Subject: Re: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline: Memory
exhausted
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au writes:
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot
y: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet:
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-11 22:37 ---
Subject: Re: New: ld is unable to link 32 bit libffi.so on gcc mainline:
Memory exhausted
Some additional investigation revealed the following:
* bfd_set_error (bfd_error_no_memory) is called
at airs dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7024
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC bui
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2007-09-03 13:13 ---
Subject: Re: gld fails to link Solaris 10/x86 libnsl.so
hjl at lucon dot org writes:
> Does 2.17.50 work on Solaris?
Yes, it did (don't recall the exact version used). Sorry for not
--- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2007-06-29 19:04 ---
It turns out that gld 2.17.50 (the current CVS version) seems to work. I'm
currently running a GCC bootstrap with it.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4715
--- Yo
duct: binutils
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
m
ReportedBy: ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: mips-sgi-irix5.3
GCC host triplet: mips-sgi-irix5.3
GCC target triplet: mips-sgi-irix5.3
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4713
--- You are receiving th
30 matches
Mail list logo
