[Bug ld/31929] x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: final link failed: bad value

2024-06-28 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31929 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #1) > It doesn't seem to be so easy to find the appropriate place. Is there a way > to output the file and line where bfd_set_error() is called ? It looks like ther

[Bug ld/31929] x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: final link failed: bad value

2024-06-26 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31929 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) ... > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/13.2.0/../../../../x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ > ld: final link failed: bad value > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit statu

[Bug ld/31929] New: x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: final link failed: bad value

2024-06-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15595 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15595&action=edit link log file When building Qt webkit with mi

[Bug ld/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2024-06-04 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker --- Has there been any progress in the meantime ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31828] New: Lack of support for HEASLR (high-entropy-va) for PE targets

2024-05-31 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15547 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15547&action=edit Patch adding high-ent

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2024-03-08 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #17 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > I am guessing that such an option would not make a lot of difference, > since the debug information will still have to be loaded and scanned. > > But that is

[Bug ld/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2023-03-01 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #2) > The current workaround is to link with the DLL instead of the import library > and add -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup to the link line. Any hint how to implement

[Bug binutils/30069] objdump (*-w64-mingw32) does not support the output of c++ symbol names for dynamic libraries

2023-02-03 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30069 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) Hi Nick, thanks for investigating. > Given that the symbols can be demangled via the command line that you use > in the description, it seems to me that fixin

[Bug binutils/30069] New: objdump (*-w64-mingw32) does not support the output of c++ symbol names for dynamic libraries

2023-02-01 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Dynamic libraries generated for windows by i686-w64-mingw32-g++ may provide c++ symbols

[Bug ld/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2022-11-23 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) > It link to an import library created from the Vulkan-Loader source ( > https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-Loader) for the shared library > vulkan-1.dll. T

[Bug binutils/29534] dllwrap, windres and dlltools use mktemp, which should be avoided

2022-09-08 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29534 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Patch applied. Thanks Nick. I think that https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17227 can also be closed now. -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug binutils/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-09-08 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|gas |binutils -- You are receiving this m

[Bug gas/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-09-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > Strange - it works perfectly for me, using the same steps as you did. (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #8) > user@host:~/src/binutils-gdb> git pull

[Bug gas/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-09-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) Hi Nick, > Please try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you. Thank you for your support. Unfortunally the patch does not seem to fit on

[Bug gas/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-09-01 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #5) The object file generated from the related source file with $ cd ~/src/test-binutils/build $ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -o test.o ~/src/test-binutils/test.c -g s

[Bug gas/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-09-01 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 14308 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14308&action=edit tests: assembler output of mentioned problem generated by i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -S -o test.s ~/src/test-

[Bug binutils/29535] Invalid combination of debug info attributes DW_AT_name and DW_AT_comp_dir with absolute source file path

2022-09-01 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29535 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) Hi Nick, > So the DW_AT_comp_dir attribute is only used when DW_AT_name contains > a relative path, not an absolute one. Thanks for the clarification, which mea

[Bug binutils/29535] New: Invalid combination of debug info attributes DW_AT_name and DW_AT_comp_dir with absolute source file path

2022-08-29 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- When using source files with absolute paths, gas

[Bug binutils/29534] New: dllwrap, windres and dlltools use mktemp, which should be avoided

2022-08-29 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- When compiling binutils cross-support packages under OBS, rpmlint raises the following issues: mingw64-cross

[Bug gas/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-08-29 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ld |gas --- Comment #3 from Ralf Habacker

[Bug ld/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-08-26 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-08-26 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Habacker --- objdump -Wi ../output/test.exe dumps <0><251a>: Abbrev Number: 9 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) <251b> DW_AT_producer: GNU C17 12.1.0 -mtune=generic -march=pentiumpro -g <254e> DW_AT_language:

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #13) > > > Since this probably results from the mass dumping of debug information in > > plain text, which is discard

[Bug binutils/29523] i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-08-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29523 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) > > /home//src/test-binutils/build/test.c: > > where it should be > > /home//src/test-binutils/test.c: that needs minor path correction: The output is /h

[Bug binutils/29523] New: i686-w64-mingw32-objdump -WL returns incorrect file paths

2022-08-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 14298 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14298&action=edit binary test cas

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #12) In connection with the time savings in parsing a file mentioned at https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1202431#c8), parsing all generated binaries i

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-25 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #11) > Maybe something with limited or fragmented memory ? After a thorough investigation of the build environment, it turned out that the speed problem was caused

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-24 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 14295 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14295&action=edit 2. Screenshot from running strace This difference is repeated very often after the difference from the f

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-24 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 14294 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14294&action=edit Screenshot from comparing strace output The attached screenshot shows clear differences between running

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-24 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8) > Would you mind trying a small test ? Does this patch make any difference to > the performance ? No, unfortunately that is not the case. [ 329s] extracting d

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-23 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #5) > Hi Ralf, > > > i686-w64-mingw32-objdump still needs about 30s to scan assistant-qt5.exe, > > where it needs 2.8s

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-23 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #4) > > I'm going to rebuild binutils 2.39 with this commit and will check if the > performance issue is also fixed. It isn't fixed. The build log (https://build.o

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-23 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #3) > Looking at the the valgrind backtrace, the commit > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit; > h=9f272209118972864b2c3799ddf2b39683c1a7b7 may

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-23 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) Hi Nick, > Please could you upload a copy of the bin/assistant.exe file so that I can > take a look ? The file is bigger than the 100k limit for adding atta

[Bug binutils/29505] xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-19 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Ralf Habacker from comment #0) > The question is whether objdump itself or in conjunction with the binaries > used can cause this problem and if so, how to fix it. At least objdump seems to h

[Bug binutils/29505] New: xxx-w64-mingw32-objdump takes a long time to scan pe binaries for debug information

2022-08-18 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- A speed issue with objdump in conjunction with binaries in portable executable format (pe) has

[Bug ld/28362] Missing linking test case for pe dll using a def file

2022-08-18 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28362 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13671|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/28362] Missing linking test case for pe dll using a def file

2021-09-22 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28362 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Target|*-w64-mingw32 |i686-w64-mingw32, |

[Bug ld/28362] Missing linking test case for pe dll using a def file

2021-09-22 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28362 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2021-09-22 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Target|*-w64-mingw32 |i686-w64-mingw32, |

[Bug ld/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2021-09-22 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|ld -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/28362] Missing linking test case for pe dll using a def file

2021-09-21 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28362 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-w64-mingw32 -- You are receiving t

[Bug binutils/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2021-09-21 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Target||*-w64-mingw32 -- You are receiving t

[Bug binutils/28363] ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2021-09-21 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28363 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 13672 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13672&action=edit Patch with testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/28363] New: ld (*-w64-mingw32) could not link a pe dll created with a def file

2021-09-21 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- The mentioned ld is able to directly link a DLL created using a def file (see attachment 13671) but not using a

[Bug binutils/28362] New: Missing linking test case for pe dll using a def file

2021-09-21 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 13671 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13671&action=edit Patch The attached patch adds a linki

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-08-27 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Habacker --- ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-10 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 12609 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12609&action=edit 0001-windmc-Reject-EOF-without-line-break.patch Converted attachment 12605 to a git formatted patch. B

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||26088 Referenced Bugs: https://sour

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||26082 Referenced Bugs: https://sour

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12608|0001-Corrects-the-broken-li |0001-Corrects-the-broken-li de

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12600|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #12) > Created attachment 12605 [details] Hi Nick, looks good to me, except on spelling error in a comment 326-: /* Skip characters in input_stram_pos up to and

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #11 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Joel Anderson from comment #10) > this suggests that this has been the > functionality for at least a very long time. Thanks for this info. > Considering this hasn't been allowed in mc.exe f

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-09 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12595|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12599|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|26088 | Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewar

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|26082 | --- Comment #4 from Ralf Habacker -

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12598|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12596|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-07 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Habacker --- (In reply to Joel Anderson from comment #7) > I do think that it is important to note that the two new patches alter > windmc behavior to accept a file where the period is immediately followed by > a EOF i

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||26088 Referenced Bugs: https://sour

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||26082 --- Comment #2 from Ralf Haback

[Bug binutils/26088] windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26088 --- Comment #1 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 12598 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12598&action=edit 0003-Corrects-the-broken-line-number-incrementation-in-th.patch Patch which corrects the broken line numb

[Bug binutils/26088] New: windmc reports incorrect line numbers

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ralf.habacker at freenet dot de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12597 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12597&action=edit sample.mc - test file windmc returns wrong line nu

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Habacker --- Created attachment 12596 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12596&action=edit 0002-Fix-catching-EOF-in-the-Windows-resource-parser.patch This patch fixes the remaining, not catched EO

[Bug binutils/26082] infinite loop in windmc

2020-06-06 Thread ralf.habacker at freenet dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26082 Ralf Habacker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralf.habacker at freenet dot de