[Bug binutils/22771] nm does not display line information for uninlined copies of functions

2018-02-05 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22771 --- Comment #1 from Paul Carroll --- Just to reduce possible confusion, when my previous comment says: If that test case is compiled and then ... I am implying If that test case is compiled with -O2 and then ... The '-O2' option is needed

[Bug binutils/22771] New: nm does not display line information for uninlined copies of functions

2018-02-01 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pcarroll at codesourcery dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10768 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10768&action=edit P

[Bug binutils/21266] New: Unstable qsort in bfd/elf64-ppc.c results in difference in ld's TLS opt 3 test on Windows

2017-03-17 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
tatus: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pcarroll at codesourcery dot com Target Milestone: --- The qsort() routine is noted to be unpredictable if 2 compared objects are consi

[Bug binutils/17512] libbfd/binutils: crashes on fuzzed samples

2016-09-07 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 Paul Carroll changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pcarroll at codesourcery dot com

[Bug binutils/19315] addr2line change for C++ symbols breaks behavior for inlined functions

2015-12-02 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 --- Comment #7 from Paul Carroll --- Thanks, Alan. I tried the patch on several test cases and they behaved as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/19315] addr2line change for C++ symbols breaks behavior for inlined functions

2015-12-02 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 --- Comment #4 from Paul Carroll --- Created attachment 8828 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8828&action=edit Executable compiled for ARM Linux with G++ 5.2.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/19315] addr2line change for C++ symbols breaks behavior for inlined functions

2015-12-02 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19315 --- Comment #1 from Paul Carroll --- If it would be useful, I can attach the 10k executable that I created from compiling my test case. I would presume the test case could be compiled for any target with g++ 5.2.0 to demonstrate this issue.

[Bug binutils/19315] New: addr2line change for C++ symbols breaks behavior for inlined functions

2015-11-30 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pcarroll at codesourcery dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 8818 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8818&action=edit C++ test cas

[Bug ld/12768] Improve the error message for linking failure

2011-05-18 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12768 --- Comment #3 from Paul Carroll 2011-05-18 10:47:55 UTC --- No, Nick, I haven't submitted any kind of patch or such as yet. I was waiting on an internal company review first, before sending the fix upstream. Your comment about tying the red

[Bug ld/12768] Improve the error message for linking failure

2011-05-16 Thread pcarroll at codesourcery dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12768 Paul Carroll changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pcarroll at codesourcery