https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31659
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #5 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #3)
> Ok, I worked around it for now by touching bfd/doc/bfd.info and
> gas/doc/as.info (which also exhibited the problem) in the source dir. I had
> to do this individ
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #4 from nightstrike ---
Looks like this is still a problem with the 2.42 release, at least on an ubuntu
system without makeinfo installed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike ---
Ok, I worked around it for now by touching bfd/doc/bfd.info and gas/doc/as.info
(which also exhibited the problem) in the source dir. I had to do this
individually, and before each rebuild. I think the bui
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.40
--
You are receiving this mail be
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: nightstrike at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following warnings are emitted during the build, many times each:
In file included from ../../gprof/../bfd/sysdep.h:29,
from ../../gprof/gprof.h:33:
../bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #2 from nightstrike ---
Renaming the included texinfo directory to test configure's ability to build
texinfo shows that that doesn't even work anymore:
/bin/sh: line 7:
/tmp/src/binutils-2.40/_/build-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/texinfo/ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30479
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
It looks like adding texinfo to top level to be built automatically (like isl,
gmp, mpfr, mpc, dejagnu, and a bunch of other stuff) doesn't work OOTB, because
the binutils tarball include a texinfo directory
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: nightstrike at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29476 for related problems.
The 2.40 tar release requires makeinfo as well. So while gprof was fixed, bfd
is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29476
--- Comment #3 from nightstrike ---
(In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #2)
> We need makeinfo 6.5 or newer.
Yup. I pointed to this in the first post, that the method used to exclude the
use of earlier versions doesn't work.
> What
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29476
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike ---
It looks like gprofng's configure tries to check the version of makeinfo and
disable building documentation if it's too old, but that doesn't actually work.
If you run make in the gprofng subdir, it will wo
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: nightstrike at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When configuring the top level binutils 2.39 package with "--prefix=/some/path
--disable-nls", gprofng fails to build with the following on a st
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-05-16 21:52
---
I'm not sure. Maybe Ralf knows?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching so
admin
AssignedTo: drow at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: nightstrike at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i586-pc-interix
GCC host triplet: i586-pc-interix
GCC target triplet: i586-pc-interix
http://sourceware.org/bug
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||Kai dot Tietz at onevision
||dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugz
bits
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: nightstrike at gmail dot com
CC: bug-
ts
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-06 17:38
---
I changed the title to reflect that. What else must be done to upgrade to the
latest version?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-04 02:55
---
I have reviewed the current version of the standards.texi file. Should this bug
report be the one that requests updating to the latest version of
"gnustandards", or is that in the project plan fo
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 23:10
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...}
> produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail d
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:05
---
Created an attachment (id=1939)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1939&action=view)
Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi
I supplied this patch in my first comment,
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:03
---
Can someone look at this patch that I supplied?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because:
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: nightstrike at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nightstrike at gmail dot com
h
24 matches
Mail list logo
