--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-23 21:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=766)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=766&action=view)
generalise previous patch, depends on earlier MIPS-OPTIONAL patch
Welcome bac
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-13 18:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=757)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=757&action=view)
attempt to extend optional symbol support to shared libraries
Hi Nick,
using the abo
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-13 17:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=756)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=756&action=view)
patch to make a mips-sgi-irix6.5 cross ld work for above test case
The above test cas
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-13 17:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=755)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=755&action=view)
new test case covering shared libraries containing optional symbols
I've updated t
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-10 18:57 ---
The testcase nwo runs fine with the patched ld:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ot]$ make bu
as -64 -o start.o start.s
as -64 -o ot.o ot.s
as -64 -o os.o os.s
/usr/local/bin/ld
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-09 21:29 ---
Sorry, the attachment lost its name: it's a gzipped tarball (ot.tar.gz).
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-09 21:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=753)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=753&action=view)
testcase for optional symbols
Okay, I gave it a try to build a testcase. It's inc
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-09 13:24 ---
I don't have any information beyond the error message and what I learned from
the message to the mailing list quoted above. The behaviour of OPTIONAL symbols
seems to be that they'r
--- Additional Comments From michael at weiser dot dinsnail dot net
2005-11-06 19:20 ---
I ran into this one as well on IRIX-6.5.28m with gcc-4.0.1 and binutils-2.16.1.
Why is this bug in status WAITING? Is more input required? I can provide testing
and debugging if required
