[Bug ld/32268] ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.42 assertion fail elfxx-mips.c:3829

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32268 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk -- You

[Bug gas/32073] [2.44 Regression] gas failed to build x86-64 Linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073 --- Comment #22 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #20) > I don't have a good solution, I see only hacks (e.g. above: fix _this_ very > instance of '(1) (2)' being pasted, to not be anymore, or alternatively to >

[Bug gas/32073] [2.44 Regression] gas failed to build x86-64 Linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk -- You

[Bug gas/32073] [2.44 Regression] gas failed to build x86-64 Linux kernel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32073 --- Comment #12 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #10) > In which case it would also be impossible to fix anomalies there. In turn > meaning that hardly any bug in parsing of input can actually be fixed. Not a >

[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #4 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Yes, it has to be a warning or error for PIC/PIE (whatever the BFD policy is here; I don't remember offhand). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/31343] MIPS: correct behavior of branch to an imm?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31343 --- Comment #1 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- The handling of R_MIPS_PC16 is correctly specified in the MIPS psABI to overflow at link time where applicable, so if the linker finds the value calculated for the symbol referred (whether it's absolut

[Bug ld/30607] [2.41 Regression] several regressions for mipsen targets

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30607 --- Comment #1 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Thank you for the bug report. It has been on my radar recently and will be sorted in the coming weeks, resources permitting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bu

[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #7 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- (In reply to Toolybird from comment #4) > Problem goes away with `make -j1 ...install'. I noticed this while > investigating issues of reproducibility. > > A lot of build systems put "-j (n>1)" global

[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Maciej W. Rozycki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk -- You