https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31761
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
> I agree with Nick's comment. Consider too that if the link had succeeded,
> your source file would have been overwritten (assuming of course that write
> acce
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32
> thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue with gnu ld. Can you
> investigate it for me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Alan was replying to comment 6 where I said the default constructor could just
be removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Then default constructing the string member is the right thing to do.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Search_directory() says:
// We need a default constructor because we put this in a
// std::vector
That is not true since C++11. Since the constructor is broken (has undefined
behaviour, which libstdc++
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, the patch is correct.
To construct an empty string either use "" as the initializer, or just use the
default constructor. Creating a string from NULL or nullptr is completely bogus
and has been und
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25747
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That was quick, thanks!
N.B. the new diagnostic says "use use".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
It seems pretty common for beginners to name an archive foo.a and then expect
-lfoo to find it.
If a link
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18992
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
13 matches
Mail list logo
