||i686-mingw32crt,
||i686-cygwin
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de
Target Milestone: ---
Hi!
While doing automated builds using a _very_ recent host GCC (gcc
(basepoints/gcc-15-2866-g9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31617
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31617
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||vax-netbsdelf, vax-linux
--
You
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de
Target Milestone: ---
In NetBSD's src/sys/arch/vax/vax/unimpl_emul.S, we had three bogus assembler
statements:
movq $0f0.0, TMPFRAC2
movd $0f0.0, TMP
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #26 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
All mass compilations of Binutils worked as expected. Linux kernel builds are
running, but no other regressions (and parisc and sh are fixed.)
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
--- Comment #21 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Got two "green":
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-parisc-generic-32bit_defconfig/57
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/linux-sh-microdev_defconfig/38
I have not yet tested whethe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28910
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
That fixes the intermediate build issue, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Slowly showing up on other builds as well: i686-pc-msdosdjgpp
(http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-pc-msdosdjgpp/38)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30197
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mipsisa64sr71k-elf
Ver
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jbg...@lug-owl.de
Target Milestone: ---
Hi!
While mass-building toolchains, I came across --target=mipsisa64sr71k-elf.
Binutils/gas built and are in $PATH for a GCC build, which fails (full log at
http
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987
--- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Build is currently restored by reverting the initial patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987
--- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Just ftr: The build-many-glibcs.py script does the equivalent of:
/var/cache/git/binutils-gdb/configure '--prefix=/tmp/b/i'
\
'--build=x86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987
--- Comment #5 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
I do regular builds (own build strategy and a hacked build-many-glibcs.py to
allow for HEAD versions) and the later started to fail since this commit:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--
You are
17 matches
Mail list logo
