https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
--- Comment #12 from Jan Smets ---
Patch works, also on mips.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
h
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
--- Comment #6 from Jan Smets ---
What would be the easiets way to reproduce a testcase.
(without sending proprietary data - are there any tools to discard all data
from object files or something?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|mips-wrs-vxworks|mips-wrs-vxworks,x86_64
Severit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets ---
I also tried the latest snapshot, so this is a different issue. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19739
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips-wrs-vxworks
--
You are receiving th
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Target Milestone: ---
ld.bfd -r on mips
When compiling object files with dwarf debug info the link time goes up
significantly. I suspect this is due to the large amount of sections.
I needed to reduce the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19152
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
fixed where, what patch/changelog ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Target Milestone: ---
$ cat test.s
.extern _start_ramcode
.text
.global init
init:
call _start_ramcode
$ gcc -c test.s -o test.o
$ ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets ---
Ping
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
CC: ccoutant at google dot com
(gdb) run --incremental --wrap _printf --wrap _fdprintf --wrap _vprintf --wrap
_vfdprintf -X -N -e _sysInit -Ttext 0x0012a000
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
Now that I'm looking at this again, these are some rough numbers:
GOLD + Map => real0m35.770s
GOLD + NO Map => real0m1.862s
BFD + Map => real0m3.128s
BFD + NO Map => real0m2.701s
(full link, no
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets ---
Last reconfirmed with 2.23.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https:/
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
CC: ccoutant at google dot com
ld.gold -T ../make/link_script_46_x86_64_rel -X -N -r --fatal-warnings -o
../lib/something.a ../objs/file.o
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15382
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets 2013-04-22
15:43:54 UTC ---
Thanks for the patch. I currently running some new builds with the patch.
Is this the same bug that triggered the assertions in 2.22 ?
In 2.22 the bfd-elf.h file does not have the mult
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15382
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips64
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourc
AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Classification: Unclassified
The segfault happens in 2.23.2.
Starting program: ld -m elf64btsmip -X -N -r --fatal-warnings -o ../lib/x.a
/tmp/a.o /tmp/b.o
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14779
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925
--- Comment #5 from Jan Smets 2012-03-30
11:18:24 UTC ---
Hi Nick
The patch you uploaded is for another PR.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets 2012-03-29
09:31:14 UTC ---
Attachments are larger then 1000kb
Object file : http://www.4shared.com/zip/-v8iMum2/filegcc34.html
Source file (might not compile with newer GCC versions) :
http://www.4shared.com/zip
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
Classification: Unclassified
This bug got introduced somewhere between 2.20 and 2.21.
I verified that 2.20 works OK with that same file. GCC 4.6.3 was used to
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13887
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
ReportedBy: jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com
CC: ccout...@google.com
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 6296
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6296
callgrind output
Ian
As requested a profile output of gold w
24 matches
Mail list logo