[Bug gold/12893] New: gold reports duplicated symbols when symbols have version both in script and in source

2011-06-15 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893 Summary: gold reports duplicated symbols when symbols have version both in script and in source Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

2010-11-23 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #4 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 06:46:57 UTC --- Whether there is or not a bug in the glibc loader, is not something that should matter here, IMHO. We have a documented use case that, ELF side, works exactly as intend

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

2010-11-23 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #2 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 01:23:18 UTC --- Created attachment 5138 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5138 Patch to solve the problem above -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug gold/12262] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

2010-11-23 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12262 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug gold/12261] New: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

2010-11-23 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Summary: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gold/12262] New: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

2010-11-23 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12262 Summary: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gas/11054] Suspicious error "missing .fnstart before unwinding directive" from libffi's ARM code

2009-12-04 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From flameeyes at gmail dot com 2009-12-04 22:37 --- Given that @ simply comments the thing out, I guess the point is that testcase3 is *empty* at that point, so I guess this is a bug in gcc's sources… -- What|Removed |

[Bug gas/11054] Suspicious error "missing .fnstart before unwinding directive" from libffi's ARM code

2009-12-04 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From flameeyes at gmail dot com 2009-12-04 20:25 --- Created an attachment (id=4445) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4445&action=view) Working testcase -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 --- You are re

[Bug gas/11054] Suspicious error "missing .fnstart before unwinding directive" from libffi's ARM code

2009-12-04 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From flameeyes at gmail dot com 2009-12-04 20:25 --- Created an attachment (id=) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=&action=view) Failing testcase -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 --- You are re

[Bug gas/11054] New: Suspicious error "missing .fnstart before unwinding directive" from libffi's ARM code

2009-12-04 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
dhat dot com ReportedBy: flameeyes at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-*-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11054 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

[Bug binutils/6915] readelf -S segfaults on Solaris-specific section types

2008-09-25 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From flameeyes at gmail dot com 2008-09-25 09:57 --- Created an attachment (id=2961) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2961&action=view) object file causing the crash // Copyright (c) 2007, Google Inc. // All rights r

[Bug binutils/6915] New: readelf -S segfaults on Solaris-specific section types

2008-09-25 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: flameeyes at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-

[Bug ld/4188] Different results in R_H8_PCREL8 relocations between direct binary output and objcopy

2007-03-15 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From flameeyes at gmail dot com 2007-03-15 16:21 --- Created an attachment (id=1619) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1619&action=view) Reduced testcase ASM sources -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4188 ---

[Bug ld/4188] New: Different results in R_H8_PCREL8 relocations between direct binary output and objcopy

2007-03-15 Thread flameeyes at gmail dot com
Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: flameeyes at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host tr