--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2010-01-25 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: ld generates bad long branch stubs
> I wonder if this bug might be fixed by the patch I attached to
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409
The patch causes tes
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-14 16:21 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: macros dot
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:
=== gas tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /opt/gnu
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-11 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:
> Created an attachment (id=4265)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-10-10 23:50 ---
Subject: Re: Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel
> I guess the hppa test failure is due to hppaelf_after_parse
> if (link_info.relocatable)
> lang_add_unique (".text&
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-06-22 14:01 ---
Subject: Re: ld: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.
Hi Nick,
> Can you create a standalone testcase to reproduce this problem ? I can
> build
> an hppa-linux-gnu compiler, but
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-06-17 15:31 ---
Subject: Re: ld generates bad long branch stubs
Hi Julian,
> I have tried to reproduce this, but not managed so far. I attempted to build
> current binutils head with current GCC head un
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-09-21 20:17 ---
Subject: Re: TLS relocs prevent changing r19 to r27 when doing static link
with PIC code on PA
> Is this a missing piece of the TLS implementation?
Yes. Thanks for looking into this.
D
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-01-02 20:12 ---
Subject: Re: eh support is broken
> Created an attachment (id=2168)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2168&action=view)
> --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzill
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2008-01-01 19:03 ---
Subject: Re: eh support is broken
> Do you have a testcase? (Preferably one with object files, so that
> a hppa binutils would be enough.)
Regarding the frame table error, I have collect
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-12-31 20:36 ---
Subject: Re: ld: I/O error, file
"/xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so": No such file or
directory
> It must be an HP-UX specific issue.
Yes, the shared library
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-12-29 18:00 ---
Subject: Re: New: eh support is broken
> The former was with ld 2.18.50.20071227. The latter was with
> 2.18.50.20070929.
2.18.50.20071214 is ok.
Dave
--
http://sourceware.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-08-09 20:07 ---
Subject: Re: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
> A patch is posted at
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00133.html
I have tried the second hunk a
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-08-01 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
Looks like this could be fixed by including "bfd_stdint.h" and
adding an appropriate dependency to Makefile
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-08 03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-05
> 22:50 ---
> C
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-03 03:51 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
> I don't think anything more can be done at the gcc end. The most likely
>
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-03 02:43 ---
Subject: Re: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-02
> 23:48 ---
> The pat
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-02 23:42 ---
Subject: Re: New: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be
created.
> > building the gcc-4.2.0 RC2 with binutils_20070426 on Debian unstable, some
> > hundred testcas
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-05-02 22:32 ---
Subject: Re: New: [regression] ld errors: no .eh_frame_hdr table will be
created.
> building the gcc-4.2.0 RC2 with binutils_20070426 on Debian unstable, some
> hundred testcases fai
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-09-05 01:37 ---
Subject: Re: -z relro may create PT_NULL segment
> The patch fixing Linux/ia64 may also work for Linux/hppa.
It works.
Dave
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-31 02:06 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> I think that raising the minimum requirement on Texinfo to version 4.4 is
> quite
> safe. I will submit a patch.
Than
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-28 04:11 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: macros dot
> This test is passing on my system -- is it still failing on HP-UX, Dave?
As of a couple of days ago, it was still failing on hpux.
Dave
--
h
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-20 04:23 ---
Subject: Re: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
> Does PIE work on hppa at all?
My understanding is that it does when the dynamic loader issue
is fixed in libc6 2.3.6-1. It seems 2.3.6 was relea
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-20 03:53 ---
Subject: Re: New: /opt/gnu64/bin/ld: main: Not enough room for program headers
(allocated 5, need 6)
The attached quick hack now allows the program to link and execute.
However, it doesn't
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-03-20 02:20 ---
Subject: Re: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
> See
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00278.html
>
> hppa may need a similar fix.
You mean something like:
Inde
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-24 18:55 ---
Subject: Re: New: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
> > tmpdir/weakundef: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc
> > type 0x
> > 42
>
> This is R_PARISC_PLA
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-02-22 01:10 ---
Subject: Re: New: pie.exp: FAIL: weak undefined
> tmpdir/weakundef: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected reloc type
> 0x
> 42
This is R_PARISC_PLABEL21L.
Dave
-
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-12-22 18:26 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08
> ---
> It works for me.
This was caused by usi
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-19 16:50 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: weakref tests
> Hey, it's the same FAILs as for mmix-knuth-mmixware!
> Ever since rth's change from ".set" to "=" for these tests.
> I
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-12 20:45 ---
Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
> > Doesn't happen when not doing a cross.
>
> Don't know why *that* case is different, but for the
Different
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-07 00:38 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
> > After all, if the fixup is for a dword, none of the insn handling code in
> > md_apply_fix is appropriate. In fact, it w
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-06 03:57 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-06
> 03:12 ---
> I'd be inclined to use
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-11-06 00:27 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong output for 64-bit difference of labels
> --- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-11-05
> 08:36 ---
> This is cau
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-23 03:01 ---
Subject: Re: ELF input section may not be handled properly
> > You need to run "make headers" in bfd to update header files.
>
> Ok, but the patch doesn't apply anymo
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-22 21:30 ---
Subject: Re: ELF input section may not be handled properly
> You need to run "make headers" in bfd to update header files.
Ok, but the patch doesn't apply anymore.
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-22 02:43 ---
Subject: Re: ELF input section may not be handled properly
> A patch is posted at
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00284.html
I hit this error:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-11 02:55 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> You need to find out why those symbols aren't defined, given that
I just found the problem. It was an insta
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-11 00:31 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> I can't duplicate your problem:
I was afraid of that. As I indicated originally, the problem seemed
start f
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:53 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:41:08PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From hjl a
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:33 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:17:12PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From hjl a
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 05:03:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > Please provide all input files for me to r
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 21:03 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Please provide all input files for me to reproduce it with a cross linker.
Attached.
Dave
--- Additional
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 20:43 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> This shouldn't be a problem since executable doesn't use any symbols in ld.so.
> If you can provide a
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 20:28 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> It looks OK. A testcase is needed.
The following C file triggers the problem:
int main () { return 0; }
The link
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 19:59 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Can you show me your "readelf -d /lib/libc.so.6":
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/binutils-2.16.91/src/bfd$ readelf
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-10 18:22 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-09 15:15
> > ---
> > If yo
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-10-09 15:18 ---
Subject: Re: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-09 15:15
> ---
> If you can provide all
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-04-11 16:33 ---
Subject: Re: New: error handling %farg[0-4] registers
> 2005-04-11 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> PR gas/818
> * config/tc-hppa.c (pre_defined_registe
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-03-07 14:43 ---
Subject: Re: Hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ breaks function pointer
canonicalization
>What|Removed |Ad
48 matches
Mail list logo
